Fontana
Reservoir
Ecological
health rating
Fontana Reservoir
rated fair in 2010, a similar rating to previous years in which the full complement of indicators was measured.
In 1994, 1995, and 2000 the overall
health score was slightly higher. This was partly because bottom life was not sampled at all
locations
in these years. Bottom life usually rates
poor
on Fontana and probably would have reduced the overall score by several
points.
Fontana
Reservoir Ecological Health Ratings, 1994-2010

Click chart for raw
data.
The table below
shows the ratings for individual ecological health indicators at Fontana
in 2010. These ratings are briefly explained in the paragraphs that follow.
|
Ecological
Health Indicators for
Fontana Reservoir, 2010
|
|
Monitoring
locations
|
Dissolved
oxygen
|
Chlorophyll
|
Fish
|
Bottom
life
|
Sediment
|
| Forebay |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mid-reservoir:
Little Tennessee River arm |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mid-reservoir:
Tuckasegee River arm |
|
|
|
|
|
Dissolved oxygen
Dissolved oxygen rated good at the forebay and fair at the Little Tennessee mid-reservoir location because a small area along the reservoir bottom contained low dissolved oxygen concentrations (< 2 mg/l) in late summer. A greater area of water with low dissolved oxygen was present at the Tuckasegee location and resulted in a poor rating. In previous years, dissolved oxygen has rated good or fair at the forebay and Little Tennessee mid-reservoir locations and fair or poor at the Tuckasegee location. However, the area with low dissolved oxygen was substantially smaller at the Tuckasegee location in 2004 than in other years, resulting in the only good rating for dissolved oxygen at this location.
Chlorophyll
Chlorophyll rated good at the forebay and Little Tennessee mid-reservoir monitoring locations and fair at the Tuckasegee location. Chlorophyll has rated good at the forebay all years monitored. Chlorophyll ratings have fluctuated between good, fair, and poor at the Little Tennessee mid-reservoir location with no specific trend over time. At the Tuckasegee mid-reservoir location, chlorophyll received good ratings during the early 1990s, but has fluctuated between fair and poor ratings since 1995.
Fish
The fish community rated good at all monitoring locations. The fish community has rated fair or good at these locations in previous years.
Bottom life
Bottom life rated poor at all monitoring locations. Bottom life has rated poor or at the low end of the fair range at these locations in past years. Each year, relatively few organisms, mainly those capable of tolerating poor conditions, are collected from the reservoir bottom.
Sediment
Sediment quality rated good at the forebay and Tuckasegee mid-reservoir locations because no PCBs or pesticides were detected and all metal concentrations were within the expected range. Copper exceeded expected background levels at the Little Tennessee mid-reservoir location, resulting in a fair rating. In 2008, chromium exceeded suggested background concentrations at this location, but neither copper nor chromium has been above background levels in other monitoring years. Historically, sediment ratings have fluctuated between good and fair at all locations depending on whether or not chlordane was detected. Chlordane was last detected in the reservoir sediments in 2002, and only at the Tuckasegee monitoring location.
See definitions of
ecological health indicators and monitoring locations.
|
|
Fish
consumption advisories
Fontana Reservoir - TVA maintains a program to examine contaminants in fish fillets from TVA reservoirs and their major tributary streams on a rotational basis. The data collected from this program is distributed to the state officials who are responsible for placing or removing fish tissue consumption advisories on those bodies of water. For information on advisories currently in effect for Fontana Reservoir, visit the Epidemiology Division of North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services’ web page. http://www.epi.state.nc.us/epi/fish/